Play­ing to Learn

Yesterday’s New York Times had a won­der­ful op-ed by Susan Engel, Play­ing to Learn, about the press­ing need to com­pletely over­haul the edu­ca­tion sys­tem. Instead of schools focus­ing so much on stan­dards and facts, the author writes:

So what should chil­dren be able to do by age 12, or the time they leave ele­men­tary school? They should be able to read a chap­ter book, write a story and a com­pelling essay; know how to add, sub­tract, divide and mul­ti­ply num­bers; detect pat­terns in com­plex phe­nom­ena; use evi­dence to sup­port an opin­ion; be part of a group of peo­ple who are not their fam­ily; and engage in an exchange of ideas in con­ver­sa­tion. If all ele­men­tary school stu­dents mas­tered these abil­i­ties, they would be pre­pared to learn almost any­thing in high school and college.

With that in mind, schools could be an engag­ing place where stu­dents read for 2 hours a day, write about sub­jects that are mean­ing­ful to them, prac­tice the math basics (and then go on to activ­i­ties that are equally essen­tial for math and sci­ence such as devis­ing orig­i­nal exper­i­ments and observ­ing the nat­ural world), and have plenty of time to play.

Is any­one listening?

Read the piece here and then copy and send it to the prin­ci­pal of your child’s ele­men­tary and mid­dle school.

25 Comments on “Play­ing to Learn”

  1. Liz Ditz says:

    Oh dear. I saw Engel’s essay via Kitchen Table Math.

    http://​kitchentablemath​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​0​/​0​2​/​s​u​s​a​n​-​e​n​g​e​l​s​-​e​v​o​l​u​t​i​o​n​a​r​y​-​n​e​w​-​p​r​o​p​o​s​a​l​s​.​h​tml

    What Engel is propos­ing as “rev­o­lu­tion­ary” for lit­er­acy is just warmed-over Whole Language.

    What Enge­lis propos­ing for math­e­mat­ics instruc­tion is already in place — con­struc­tivist math which leaves almost all innu­mer­ate and unable to think mathematically.

    Now, go look at this video of a kinder­garten class — it’s the open­ing of the day, plus a brief les­son in sound-symbol correspondence.

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​y​y​g​I​w​C​3​P​Svk

    These chil­dren are engaged and learn­ing. It’s the oppo­site of what Engel proposes.

    February 3rd, 2010 at 2:02 pm
    Permanent Link

  2. PsychMom says:

    I could only watch half of that video. So that’s what “engaged” looks like. Learn­ing what? To be par­rots. To obey the rules in a mind­less fash­ion. Does that poor teacher have only a script to fill her days?

    I wish I had a video of what I’ve seen go on in my child’s class­room. Small groups of 4 or 5 kids, sit­ting or stand­ing at large child-height tables.…chatting, some­times laugh­ing, hands busy, heads down, past­ing, writ­ing, constructing…sometimes watching/observing. The teacher talk­ing in quiet tones offer­ing sug­ges­tions, ask­ing questions.

    I “get” what goes on in my child’s class­room. I don’t under­stand what I saw on that video.…it fright­ens me.

    February 3rd, 2010 at 2:39 pm
    Permanent Link

  3. Anonymous says:

    That was the most hor­ri­ble edu­ca­tion video I have ever watched. This goes beyond scary. This does not resem­ble any­thing I have learned or prac­ticed in my 17 years as an edu­ca­tor. What was demon­strated in the video is all about mind­less com­pli­ance, author­i­ta­tive lead­er­ship, and only a hint of actual learn­ing. It seems that the rules that the stu­dents were to fol­low needed daily rep­e­ti­tion. Might this be due to a mis­match between the goal of learn­ing and the learn­ing envi­ron­ment? How can any­one expect chil­dren to engage in orig­i­nal, authen­tic, and mean­ing­ful dis­cus­sions and activ­i­ties when their heads are full of monkey-see-monkey-do ver­biage? Why must there be posted incen­tives on the wall for prizes and par­ties? Is the envi­ron­ment not worth­while as it is? Should any edu­ca­tor really have to bribe chil­dren to be good? I have found (for many years now) that the more respect I give stu­dents, the more I get back AND the more they seem to respect each other. And I teach thirteen-year-olds – the ones that many say are the worst of the bunch! All stu­dents can achieve great­ness but few will be inspired to do so because an author­i­tar­ian dic­ta­tor with a teach­ing degree tries to make them.

    February 3rd, 2010 at 3:57 pm
    Permanent Link

  4. FedUpMom says:

    Holy cow. How can this be called “whole brain”? There’s no room for an inde­pen­dent thought. There’s no room for cre­ativ­ity or imag­i­na­tion. Those are impor­tant brain functions.

    I get that there are prob­lems with con­struc­tivist math cur­ric­ula. But if this is the alter­na­tive, I’ll take the con­struc­tivists any day. Maybe they for­got to teach the kids how to divide frac­tions, but at least they’ve got room the kids get to be human beings.

    February 3rd, 2010 at 6:07 pm
    Permanent Link

  5. HomeworkBlues says:

    I just watched half the video. I’m headed out of town and will look at the rest when I come back. Not sure I need to see more. I agree with the oth­ers here.

    This is “whole brain?” More like brain­wash­ing to me. These kids are automa­tons. They are merely par­rot­ing back what the teacher is ask­ing them to do. It is very teacher directed, she is front and cen­ter, except when she lets some other kid par­rot her rules, and the chil­dren are not exhibit­ing any inde­pen­dent thought.

    I agree with FedUp­Mom. I’ll take con­struc­tivist edu­ca­tion over this any day. At least there, the chil­dren are truly engaged, happy, self directed and curi­ous. These chil­dren are rewarded for play­ing the game, not step­ping out line, being quiet, com­pli­ant, and fol­low­ing direc­tions. Read the com­ments. It is dis­turb­ing that so many teach­ers embraced this video.

    These small chil­dren are being con­di­tioned early on to please the teacher, play by the rules, not to rock the boat, and god for­bid, have an orig­i­nal thought. Let’s pray there are no Ein­steins or Edis­ons in this group for surely they would be put in their place quickly and no doubt pun­ished for col­or­ing out­side the lines.

    February 4th, 2010 at 12:48 pm
    Permanent Link

  6. PsychMom says:

    You know what kept com­ing to my mind as I watched that video.….? The cre­ation of the next gen­er­a­tion of fast food work­ers. Or army boot camp maybe..

    “Did you want the meal or the sandwich?”

    “Any fries with that?”

    I think the point…and I may be wrong about this.… is to get the kids phys­i­cally involved as they chant mind­lessly. Maybe this is mul­ti­task­ing at its finest…

    And on top of all that, it was grat­ing to the ears. There’s no melody, just yelling.

    February 4th, 2010 at 1:33 pm
    Permanent Link

  7. HomeworkBlues says:

    Psy­ch­Mom, my first thought as I began to watch was mil­i­tary train­ing. I found it not only dis­turb­ing but down­right scary. We are in awe of China these days. Just how much, we need to ask.

    Just goes to show you you can never take democ­racy for granted. When things creep up on soci­ety lit­tle by lit­tle, the gen­eral pub­lic is caught unawares. I’m reminded of that famous Thomas Jef­fer­son quote: “the price of lib­erty is eter­nal vig­i­lance.” Please let’s be vig­i­lant. This may not lead to some­thing nefar­i­ous but it doesn’t mat­ter. It’s killing thought and inno­va­tion early. And we need peo­ple to be aware.

    A well known Holo­caust sur­vivor who has writ­ten sev­eral books, once said to me, “You Amer­i­cans are such a messy bunch. And I love it. You are all so rebel­lious. You are all such vocal thinkers. This is good. It means I can die assured the Holo­caust will never hap­pen here. You won’t let it.” Let us remem­ber her words. And decide that mind­less obe­di­ence is not what this great coun­try of ours, this land of free­dom stands for.

    February 4th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
    Permanent Link

  8. PsychMom says:

    Is it those types of teach­ers who tell us we’re not good par­ents because we don’t fall in line and sign their read­ing logs?.…ahhhh, now I see.

    I’ll take my deeply deprived math con­struc­tivist daugh­ter, over that lunacy…any day.

    February 4th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
    Permanent Link

  9. HomeworkBlues says:

    Yes, Psych. It’s a peck­ing order. I’m specif­i­cally address­ing the teach­ers who lam­baste us here, not the good inspir­ing ones.

    Take educ8, for exam­ple, who com­mented the other day and then, like Dis­il­lu­sioned says, was a hit and run. She is obe­di­ent and fol­lows the dic­tates of the prin­ci­pal to the let­ter of the law, no ques­tions asked. She then passes it on…to you! When you fail to fall in line, assem­bly line style, she is mys­ti­fied and then angered. Slows down the mass production!

    Except we’re not mak­ing wid­gets, we’re not even mak­ing chil­dren. We are there to inspire and guide them so they can mold themselves.

    February 4th, 2010 at 3:22 pm
    Permanent Link

  10. Anonymous says:

    After view­ing that video, I clicked on a cou­ple of other YouTube related videos and I couldn’t believe what I saw. Please tell me that this “power teach­ing” or “whole brain teach­ing” or what­ever they call it is not as com­mon as it sounds. Please tell me that there are still good teach­ers out there like Susan Ohan­ian and those that actu­ally care about a child’s own unique learn­ing needs, or even look at a child as a human being. This new crazy tech­nique is all about com­pli­ance and, like Home­work­Blues stated, assem­bly line teach­ing. I don’t even know what they’re try­ing to teach. I can’t imag­ine my own child in a class like this. I think he would be cry­ing after 2 min­utes from the noise alone. No doubt he would be labeled a dis­obe­di­ant trou­ble maker for refus­ing to go along with this nonsense.

    Unfor­tu­nately, I have expe­ri­ence too many teach­ers who are so focused on keep­ing a class com­pli­ant and in con­trol that they will resort to any means such as bribes, threats, and pun­ish­ments. Actual learn­ing is not the pri­mary goal. I can imag­ine how such a teacher would think that this new method of con­trol is fab­u­lous. Now they don’t even have to think up ways to con­trol the kids — they can just fol­low the script includ­ing how many smi­ley faces and frowny faces to give out.

    If you want to be scared, watch a few more videos about this insanity:

    Here’s a power teach­ing train­ing with ref­er­ence to with­hold­ing recess and giv­ing extra home­work based on frowny faces:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​e​B​e​W​E​g​v​G​m​2​Y​&​a​m​p​;​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​=​r​e​l​a​ted

    And an annoy­ing first grade class:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​f​r​w​P​9​f​8​5​T​n​U​&​a​m​p​;​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​=​r​e​l​a​ted

    Please tell me that this type of “teach­ing” isn’t spread­ing! We have enough con­trol freak teach­ers out there as it is. I will be hav­ing night­mares tonight.

    February 4th, 2010 at 4:24 pm
    Permanent Link

  11. HomeworkBlues says:

    Hey, Anony­mous, your post is too good to be Anony­mous. Come up with a han­dle, as we used to say in the old days, so we can iden­tify you! And thanks for the validation.

    Yes, very scary. Power Teach­ing. Oh, my. We have power break­fasts and power walks and now we have Power Teach­ing. The walks at least make sense. But Power Teach­ing? Let there be no mis­take about it. We all know where the “Power” lies and it ain’t with the children.

    I know Susan Ohan­ian. She is that remark­able one of a kind teacher. She fights so hard to pre­serve this pro­fes­sion. For all the edu­ca­tional drek I see out there, a few notable teach­ers stand out. Why only a few? That is the most heart­break­ing of all. Where did all the teach­ers go? If only Mary Tra­vers were still alive, she could craft a song for our times.

    Teach­ers should be our great­est allies. What’s with all this con­trol, mind bend­ing and obe­di­ence? It is awfully scary and I’m glad we here at least, are wise to it.

    Peter Paul and Mary: “Where have all the flow­ers gone?”

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​7​b​t​c​I​j​3​p​4-I

    I saw this group almost every sum­mer at Wolf Trap. And now Mary is gone.

    February 4th, 2010 at 5:34 pm
    Permanent Link

  12. Disillusioned says:

    I watched the video and was read­ing some of the com­ments. Some­one posted that class­room dis­ci­pline (or lack of) was the num­ber one rea­son “good” teach­ers leave the pro­fes­sion. I am so blown away that the class­rooms of today are the same as the 1800’s. The par­a­digm of con­trol before learn­ing hasn’t changed much since the bygone days. HWB com­mented on how teach­ers are stuck in the fifties in regards to their rela­tions to admin­is­tra­tion and par­ents (fum­ing, seething, and silent).

    When NCLB and uber-testing became all the rage; the fac­tory school kicked into high gear. The robo– teach­ers I see in these videos will prob­a­bly be replaced by REAL robots in the not so dis­tant future. This might be a plus since robots don’t down­load their pent up rage to par­ents and chil­dren. Now, if only those pesky chil­dren could be replaced by robots, the whole sys­tem would run like a well oiled machine.

    February 4th, 2010 at 6:05 pm
    Permanent Link

  13. FedUpMom says:

    I have a bad feel­ing that this is what KIPP schools look like. It’s hor­ri­fy­ing to watch. It reminds me of the Hitler Youth. It’s more indoc­tri­na­tion than education.

    I can’t imag­ine what it would be like to be one of those kids, to have every moment of the day scripted, down to the ges­tures. Besides the obvi­ous prob­lems, I think it would lead to an incred­i­bly shal­low level of learn­ing. There’s no time or pri­vacy for a child to put together a thought in his head.

    Give the teacher a pitch­fork, and you’d have a per­fect vision of Hell.

    February 4th, 2010 at 6:30 pm
    Permanent Link

  14. April says:

    @ FedUp­Mom,
    I watched the 4th grade video, and was unim­pressed, but I do feel the need to chime in to say that no, that wasn’t our expe­ri­ence with KIPP. My older daugh­ter attended KIPP in 5th grade, and while there was a lot of home­work, it was home­work where I could see value. For instance, she had to write a page in a Com­po­si­tion book every night, but it was free-write, with maybe a theme thrown in, like tell a scary story for Hal­loween, or write about a men­tor. It was not graded, but it was a chance for her to write and cre­ate, and she often looked for­ward to it. She went from an aver­age stu­dent to a straight A stu­dent, and thrived there. (She also had music and art as part of her cur­ricu­lum, which she loved, and they had oppor­tu­ni­ties to see the LA Phil­har­monic and other cool things.)
    Also, the teach­ers were required to answer cell phones ’til 9 pm if the stu­dents didn’t under­stand an assign­ment, and I could email them when­ever I wanted and felt like I had true part­ners in her edu­ca­tion than we ever had before. (I ques­tioned the Prin­ci­pal on the amount of home­work they received, and while he agrees that home­work is not always help­ful, he allowed the teach­ers to run their class­rooms as they saw fit.)
    Hav­ing said that, I pulled her out after 5th grade because they put in a new Prin­ci­pal, and 2/3 of the teach­ers left, and I didn’t trust that the new Prin­ci­pal would keep the warm, sup­port­ive and yes, COLLABORATIVE envi­ron­ment that we felt in our time there. So I wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily rec­om­mend KIPP as a blan­ket assess­ment, but it’s cer­tainly worth explor­ing your local KIPP and see­ing how you feel.

    February 4th, 2010 at 7:13 pm
    Permanent Link

  15. HomeworkBlues says:

    That’s what I thought, FedUp. Hitler Yugent. That’s why I quoted the Holo­caust survivor.

    February 4th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
    Permanent Link

  16. HomeworkBlues says:

    Speak­ing of indoc­tri­na­tion, at some schools here, the chil­dren are made to do a happy dance the day before the state tests. They are forced to march and sing how happy they are to be test­ing the next day. Is that omi­nous, or what?

    February 4th, 2010 at 9:22 pm
    Permanent Link

  17. FedUpMom says:

    April, I don’t have a “local KIPP”, it’s just some­thing I’ve been read­ing about. I’m glad you had a good expe­ri­ence with a KIPP school, at least for a year.

    February 4th, 2010 at 9:25 pm
    Permanent Link

  18. FedUpMom says:

    Imag­ine my sur­prise when I read some­thing I pretty much agree with in Valerie Strauss’ col­umn! It’s here:

    http://​voices​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​a​n​s​w​e​r​-​s​h​e​e​t​/​d​a​n​i​e​l​-​w​i​l​l​i​n​g​h​a​m​/​w​i​l​l​i​n​g​h​a​m​.​h​tml

    Basi­cally, Will­ing­ham says what I’ve been sus­pect­ing for a while: pro­gres­sive ed can be fab­u­lous when it’s done well, but it’s hardly ever done well. When it’s done badly, you get a load of point­less mush. I think we’ve all seen this in action.

    You can be in favor of pro­gres­sive ed, you can be in favor of tra­di­tional ed, but it all comes down to imple­men­ta­tion. The best phi­los­o­phy, imple­mented badly, can be a disaster.

    February 6th, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Permanent Link

  19. FedUpMom says:

    Also, I took a look at the Whole Brain web­site, and found this, under “Teach­ing Chal­leng­ing Students”:

    *******
    If class­room instruc­tion enter­tain­ingly engages the whole brain, stu­dents don’t have any men­tal area left over to cre­ate chal­leng­ing behav­ior!
    *******

    In other words, if every moment is scripted, down to the words the kids say and the ges­tures they make, there’s no room in their heads for any­thing else. That’s not edu­ca­tion, it’s brainwashing.

    February 6th, 2010 at 11:28 am
    Permanent Link

  20. Jeff says:

    Wow! I have to say I hear things like this quite a bit. WBT really needs to do some­thing about those videos. I am hear­ing what is unfor­tu­nately a pretty com­mon set of mis­con­cep­tions about what WBT is and how teacher who use it actu­ally operate.

    The videos you are see­ing show the most basic begin­ning tech­niques used in WBT. Rep­e­ti­tion is the basis of learning…initially, and that is all you are really see­ing in these. The ini­tial stages of teaching,

    I teach mid­dle school sci­ence. We use very com­plex vocab­u­lary. The kids need to learn the vocab­u­lary to a point of mas­tery, and then be able to con­nect the vocab­u­lary terms together to form big­ger con­cepts, and then take these con­cepts and use inquiry, deduc­tive rea­son­ing, and col­lab­o­ra­tive learn­ing, to cre­ate end prod­ucts through analy­sis, syn­the­sis, and evaluation.

    We use the parts you are see­ing, basic knowl­edge level using three sen­sory input sys­tems instead of one, only to make sure that we are all speak­ing the same lan­guage. If my stu­dents can­not tell me the dif­fer­ence in bac­te­r­ial, viral, fun­gal, and pro­tist pathogens they can­not under­stand the inter­ac­tion of the parts of the immune sys­tem in com­bat­ing them in the body.

    You are incor­rectly assum­ing that what you see is all there is to WBT. Fur­ther­more, the aver­age length of reten­tion for com­mon vocab­u­lary words for most mid­dle school stu­dents in a func­tional sense is three to six weeks before their mem­o­ries are culled through the nor­mal action of the brain’s mem­ory man­age­ment sys­tem. My kids, on the other hand, do not spend mind­less hours writ­ing down vocab­u­lary, in fact we do not write down vocab­u­lary. The reten­tion time for my kids on any given vocab­u­lary terms is in excess of fif­teen weeks.

    WBT instruc­tors expect that pro­fes­sional teach­ers will see the videos for what they are– the way to start out, and then mod­ify them as they need.

    On the com­ment from “Teach­ing Chal­leng­ing Teens” here:

    If class­room instruc­tion enter­tain­ingly engages the whole brain, stu­dents don’t have any men­tal area left over to cre­ate chal­leng­ing behavior!

    The poster is assum­ing that this refers to the robotic script­ing of classes. The actual intent is that if you are mak­ing the class­room fun and engag­ing the kids will not feel a need to engage in such behav­iors. Most chal­leng­ing behav­ior results from kids being bored, or not under­stand­ing what is expected of them in class. Keep­ing the class­room fun and engag­ing elim­i­nates the need for the kids to feel like they have to act out.

    I use the five rules, and the kids love it. I never have to yell at my kids, or even raise my voice. They han­dle most of the class­room man­age­ment, and appre­ci­ate that I give that to them through the Score­board Game. If some­one is talk­ing while I am talk­ing there is no con­fronta­tion, embarass­ment, or power strug­gle. I have the whole class quickly do the ges­ture and repeat rule two. No one is embarassed, I have not fussed at any­one directly, and there is no oppor­tu­nity for a power strug­gle that could derail the class.

    I under­stand the objec­tions I have seen, and would agree with them, if any of it were accu­rate. It is not the fault of the posters. I just think that those of us who actu­ally use WBT and know what is really going on in these class­rooms need to do a bet­ter job of demon­strat­ing how we actu­ally work so we can elim­i­nate the unfor­tu­nate mis­con­cep­tions some of these videos are lead­ing to.

    The method is fun for them and for me. They are not par­rots or robots. I am MOST CERTAINLY NOT train­ing my stu­dents to be future fast food employ­ees. My stu­dents are active, engaged learn­ers. My stu­dents are being trained to be sci­en­tists, attor­neys, physi­cians, archi­tects, astro­nauts, engi­neers, CEO’s and entre­pre­neurs. They learn the basics through the meth­ods you see, and then go so much fur­ther, using these meth­ods as well as a vari­ety of other methods.

    I am a Whole Brain Teacher.

    Jeff

    February 11th, 2010 at 11:08 pm
    Permanent Link

  21. Anonymous says:

    To Jeff,
    I don’t have time to write a full response but I think your last para­graph enca­pu­lates both your point and makes my point. You are happy to train students…and I ‘d say your method works well if that’s your goal. You are not train­ing “sci­en­tists, attor­neys, physi­cians, archi­tects, astro­nauts, engi­neers, CEO’s and entre­pre­neurs” by the way.…you are train­ing 12,13 year old chil­dren. Those micro­bi­ol­ogy con­cepts that you described, BTW, were a part of my 2nd year micro­bi­ol­ogy course in university…not high school.

    I don’t send my child to school to be trained for any­thing. She’s not a seal…or unruly ani­mal that needs to be kept in line. My goal for her edu­ca­tion is to have the world opened up for her, and for her to be encour­aged in the use of the tools avail­able to her to explore what she’s inter­ested in. I don’t want any brain cells taken up with remem­ber­ing RULE #2.

    February 12th, 2010 at 8:15 am
    Permanent Link

  22. FedUpMom says:

    Jeff, WBT designs, pro­duces and pro­motes the videos. I think it’s rea­son­able to assume that the videos show what WBT is about.

    You say, “the method is fun for them and fun for me.” Maybe your idea of “fun” is repeat­ing rules out loud with pre­scribed ges­tures, but it isn’t mine.

    February 12th, 2010 at 11:44 am
    Permanent Link

  23. FedUpMom says:

    I have become very skep­ti­cal of teach­ers claim­ing their stu­dents love their class and are hav­ing fun. In my expe­ri­ence, teach­ers often don’t know what stu­dents think of them and their classes. I know of at least 2 instances when my daugh­ter was deeply unhappy and the teach­ers caus­ing her unhap­pi­ness had absolutely no idea. They thought she was “quiet”.

    February 12th, 2010 at 3:15 pm
    Permanent Link

  24. Outside the Box says:

    FedUp­Mom — I agree with you com­pletely. I think this teacher may be mis­tak­ing com­pli­ance with “fun”.

    He states, “I have not fussed at any­one directly, and there is no oppor­tu­nity for a power strug­gle that could derail the class.” No time for think­ing either. I am dis­gusted that a mid­dle school teacher would use such a juve­nile behav­ioral con­trol tech­nique as the “score­board game”. My kids had a sim­i­lar chart in first grade and, even at that young age, they were insulted by it.

    February 12th, 2010 at 3:37 pm
    Permanent Link

  25. Teach1 says:

    I have seen this video before, as well as oth­ers about power teach­ing, and I’d like to respond to some of the com­ments as well. I teach first grade in an urban school dis­trict. I teach in an area where chil­dren have no struc­ture at home or in their envi­ron­ment out­side of school, and there­fore act out in deplorable and some­times very vio­lent ways in the class­room; there­fore I think rou­tine, rules and pos­i­tive incen­tives (because no mat­ter who you are or where you come from, peo­ple liked to be acknowl­edged for the good things they do) play an impor­tant role in keep­ing behav­iors under con­trol so that learn­ing can take place. Teach­ers are not there to be drill sergeants and dis­ci­pli­nar­i­ans after all. What I did not like about the video, as an edu­ca­tor who is held to NCLB stan­dards and all that that implies, is the lack of inde­pen­dent thought and cre­ativ­ity that the stu­dents dis­played. It is very impor­tant for the stu­dents to know the rules and to be held account­able for their actions with incen­tives, and it is impor­tant for young chil­dren to have a rou­tine that is some­what pre­dictable to help them feel own­er­ship and con­trol, but it is also impor­tant to let them stretch their minds and per­son­al­i­ties, which Power Teach­ing does not seem to allow them to do. There is a lot of judg­ment passed on what is good teach­ing, but some­thing one should always keep in the back of their minds is this. Teach­ing is becom­ing what soci­ety is mak­ing it. Teach­ing the ways that many of you are so upset about is not what many teach­ers want to do, or even like doing. Teach­ing is not what it used to be, and may never be what it used to be. It is becom­ing cookie cut­ter and robotic. As a teacher, I feel that singing about the days of the week and review­ing the rules has its place in the class­room, for some struc­ture and nor­malcy, and I don’t see incen­tives as bribes, but as a way to main­tain struc­ture when it is one against 30, and you’re deal­ing with stu­dents who have never fol­lowed a rule in all their lives. On the other hand, this is not teach­ing our chil­dren to be thinkers, learn­ers and to ques­tion what they are learn­ing and explore what they are learn­ing. There is a bal­ance between rou­tine and free­dom. Unfor­tu­nately, most edu­ca­tors in the pub­lic school sys­tem are not allowed to find that bal­ance. We want and need to keep our jobs, and as much as the kids are not enjoy­ing it…many edu­ca­tors do not enjoy it either.

    February 15th, 2010 at 7:43 pm
    Permanent Link

Leave a comment on “Play­ing to Learn”

Your Info (optional)




Comment (required)

Message